Not to mention, route caching bugs can cause major hard to troubleshoot issues in service provider environments. MikroTik putting it back is out of the question. It required hundreds of changes to the Linux kernel to remove it in the first place, it was a huge job. It is completely impossible for MikroTik to reimplement route caching even if they wanted to. So, devs, please, fix this! Because keenetic giga product line can offer 990 mbits by NAT and has working wireguard in firmwares.īut they do not have winbox and own CLI, that I like so much in your products. I really like your products, because only you have such amount of small WIRED routers with such functionality. My conclusion: It's performance regression. Then I rolled back to 6.49 and got same results I used to have. I tried 10 times, then i made factory reset and repeated again: results were the same - not higher than 500. And it was a such bummer to see this after update:ĭownload: 418.22 Mbps (data used: 204.1 MB) I really was waiting for 7 because want to replace slow OpenVPN with fast Wireguard. My ISP plan is 500 Mbits, but on start testing with speedtest-net it gives even 900, then shapes slowly to ~600.Īll tests were made on PC with wired connection and CLI app speedtest-net on stable version of debian linux.ĭownload: 670.01 Mbps (data used: 318.3 MB) STP if off to get max hw acceleration, a few simple rules to open port for OVPN server and drop others - plain firewall setup nothing complex.īeing on 6.49 I measured speed by speedtest net app every 3-5 days just for self control to be sure everything fine. There is no any complex settings on router - it has been used as simple soho router for 2 clients connected mostly by ethernet, rarely by wifi. Connection to ISP provider is by 1000BASE-T, simple DHCP client. It's main device in my home gigabit network. I post this topic here because mikrotik deleted my detailed comment on youtube under video Router OS 7!Īfter flashing ROS 7 stable on my home hEX S I faced Up/Down speed drop.
0 kommentar(er)
